NEW: Learning electronics? Ask your questions on the new Electronics Questions & Answers site hosted by CircuitLab.
Support Forum » Weighscale project
August 29, 2010 by Ralphxyz |
I have the weighscale project compiled and running on my Nerdkit. I finally have Python installed and I am running the weighscale_pc-weighScale.py code. This is what I get without any weight on the scale: Why all of the meaningless activity when there is no weight on the scale? Then if i do put weight on the scale the scale is so huge that nothing is represented. I mean it is looking for 20,000,000,000 to 120,000,000,000 cans. Is this just to be expected and if I want any thing usable I just need to roll my own? I actually do not need the pc connection and python as everything I need to display will be on the LCD but the LCD only shows 271 no matter what I do just a static 271 no scrolling. I modified the weighscale C program to add the LCD output.
How would I get a active reading on the LCD? Thanks again as always for the much needed help. Ralph |
---|---|
December 01, 2010 by bdubb427 |
I would love to see if this code works too. I am currently having problems running my pygame.py and weighscale.py. Python hasn't been very kind to me so I want to see if I can get an active reading on the LCD as well. I tried using your code Ralph and the LCD only displays "Reading: 2217". Any help on this would be appreciated!!! Thanks Bryan |
December 02, 2010 by Ralphxyz |
Ok, good you are getting a reading. "Reading: 2217" is coming from Line 87: fprintf_P(&lcd_stream, PSTR("Reading: %d"), adc_read); Try fprintf_P(&lcd_stream, PSTR("Yup it works: %d"), adc_read); to make sure. Now analyze the code to see what 2217 means. Possible you need to divide adc_read by a thousand or one hundred, or not. What are you weighing? I also had a tough time with python, I did get it to work but it was not easy. Ralph |
December 02, 2010 by Ralphxyz |
Here is my last working code:
I have not looked at this for three months but I believe it was working. I do not know if there is anything specific about my strain gauge setup so it might not be generic. Ralph |
December 08, 2010 by bdubb427 |
Hey Ralph, bare with me please because I am very knew to this, and I am what you would call a "noobie". I've been trying to get my weighscale project to work for severals weeks now, and still have been unsuccessful. I gave up on using python with all the errors I had with it, so stumbling across your post I wanted to try to get the LCD to display an active reading just through the weighscale.C code. Trying your code I get a reading that says Reading: (on line 1), 483 (on line 2), than again 483 (on line 3). I am unsure of what this actually means because my ACTUAL weighscale has not been connected to the MCU/Amplifier. I have not connected it because even after soldering the 4 wires on my digital weighscale, I do not know which ones are sense and excite :( I can randomly plug them in to see if they change the reading on the LCD, but so far no luck. Here's a picture of the wires, can you tell me what you think? There are four wires coming out from the back of the weighscale, Light Blue, Yellow, Black and Red. I have to assume for now that Black and Red are the Excite wires going out to the MCU, and the Light blue and Yellow wires are the "sense" wires that go into the amplifier. Please help me or correct me if am I wrong about this! I've been struggling to get my LCD to display the reading of the weighscale! |
December 08, 2010 by Ralphxyz |
Because I do not know what I am doing, I therefore do not know what I should not do, so I would try it (others might scream at the thought, but hey it works for me)! I liked your drawing in your other thread. I would "assume" red and black are excite and blue and yellow are your sense wires. You really need to have a multimeter, you will find that you are always are coming up with needing one as you build circuits so treat yourself to a Christmas gift, no matter your religion. I would test your op-amp output without anything connected to have a base line to start. Ralph |
April 24, 2011 by abd445 |
Hey, I tried to display the weight on the LCD but it is really "jumpy", as in the reading from the ADC varies a lot. Even if the scale is off, it jumps around a lot, I am not using python code, just trying to display the raw ADC voltage on the LCD. Does your values flicker too? |
April 25, 2011 by Ralphxyz |
Hi abd445, if I remember correctly yes it was jumpy. Are you using the Nerdkit tempsensor code for ADC capture? Or actually if you are using something similar using a averaging scheme maybe you could change the data type and use a thousand samples instead of 100. Or do a average of the average of the average and display that. And/or if you are in a loop assign a value from the ADC to a new variable then break the loop and display the new variable. There probable are ways of reducing the sensitivity of the op-amp also. It's to bad the timing of your asking about the strain gauge project is off by two months. I was going to revive working on my strain gage project late spring or summer so then I would have a working device at hand to better help you. Your project probable is approaching a deadline for completion. How is the whole project doing. I really liked the outline of what you were trying to do. Ralph |
May 03, 2011 by Ralphxyz |
Hey abd445 I do not know if you were following my thread on jumpy ADC readout but bretm posted some sudo code that might solve the problem. I have not tested it yet. Ralph |
May 05, 2011 by Ralphxyz |
abd445 and others looking to slow the ADC sample rate down I published my working code (bretm's modifications) and Noter publish an over sampling codesample that should also do the trick. Ralph |
May 05, 2011 by BobaMosfet |
What is the circuit in the above picture? I see a blob-chip, and some other chips, but the pic is a bit hazy, so I can't read the writing on the chips or smb parts. If the sensor has a number, perhaps I can find a datasheet. BM |
Please log in to post a reply.
Did you know that a motor is harder to turn when its terminals are shorted together? Learn more...
|